2023年6月8日 星期四

回覆國外研究者詢問國軍SA-16的問題

The first 8 must be: 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019. 

I remember a pilot told me that 1019 was some kind of “first” aircraft and its photo had been on the cover of brochure or manual, so I would guess that 1019 is 80588.

The second batch must be 1020 and 1021.
1021 was shot down on Jan 9, not Jan. 10.

The third batch must be 1022. 1023, 1024 and 1025.

As the 110xx number, it is really very odd. My theory is in the beginning, it was a small code on the fin like (SA-)16012, I remember having seen this kind of number somewhere. Then when the RoCAF began to change the big code on fuselage from 3 digits to 4 digits, they change 160XX to 110XX to avoid duplication with F-860XX because F-86012’s big code will be 6012 and SA-16012 will be 6012 too.
The other odd thing is when everybody was carrying 3 digit big code, the SA-16 carried 2 digit code, like 12, 15, etc.  

 

沒有留言:

張貼留言

Ju 52參與西安事變

  我在士林官邸外面的看板上看到這張照片,一看就知道照片洗反了,因為這一架是Ju 52,機身上的D-左右相反。這個D-是德國的民航註冊編號字首,後面跟著四碼的字母或數字。 照片中的老外是澳洲人端納( William Henry Donald),他原來是張作霖父子的顧問,後來也成為...